Review: Becoming Unbelievably Successful, by John Knotts

Review: Becoming Unbelievably Successful, by John Knotts

I bought this book a year ago, scanned it, and put it aside. I was too wrapped up in finishing  and self-publishing my own book and my “too cool for the people” cynicism kicked in every time, I picked it up.

I am not really the target market for this book. I’m 76 and comfortably retired, not really in the becoming unbelievably successful game. And yet . . .

. . . I got a great deal out of it. I especially liked and am revisiting the description of success defined, ikigai, how to think about and find purpose, and the Universal Laws.

John Knots’ story is kind of amazing, from not-so-great student to sergeant in the Air Force to many, many letters after his name, certifications and degrees, working on a doctorate. He’s started businesses and charities and does excellent work helping veterans with PTSD using horses, equine therapy. John still doesn’t call himself unbelievably successful, only says he is “on the path.”

I bought this book because I’ve met the author and because I was writing a book on how to be successful in a career (Traveling the Consulting Road: Career wisdom for new consultants, candidates, and their mentors), so John Knotts and I have something in common. We both want  to share what we’ve learned to make others’ path easier.

This is a book about self-leadership, about taking responsibility for your life and creating the life you want. I have in my life been this proactive and I have also just let life happen to me. In my experience being proactive works better. This is a lesson, I relearned far too many times, but finally got right. Would this book have helped me? Maybe.

There is a great deal in this book that will help someone become successful and it is clear that it is better if you start earlier rather than later. But I think John believes that if someone is the kind of high school student he describes himself as being (or that I was), that this book would be extraordinarily helpful. It would, but I doubt that I would ever have read it. If a parent or mentor bought it for me, I might have read it, but not in a way that I’d have gotten much out of it.

You see this is a workbook. John Knotts shares some very interesting ideas, some genuinely helpful ones in fact, but first you have to have thought about what success means to you, which probably means experiencing a little success and a little failure, even vicariously. Then you have to sit down to do the work. This book contains a helpful framework for the work.

The two most important chapters are Chapter 4, defining what success means for you, and Chapter 7, creating the plan. John has questions at the end of each chapter, but those questions aren’t all equal. He has recall questions to stimulate your memory, which are important, but “teachy.” The most important questions are the ones that deal with your application of the concepts to your life.

I came to learn (the hard way) that success, whether in business or life, is first about clear direction. Knowing where you are going and what you want to achieve is critical. Then it is about building capability, knowledge, skills, and support system to get you there. And it is about connections, the people who can help you on your path. This book covers all that and much more.

But it’s a workbook; it won’t work unless you do the work.

Traveling the Consulting Road is Available Now on Amazon

Please forgive the crass commercialism. I haven’t figured out how to attract sales for my book without hawking it. 😊 – Alan

The Ages of Man

The Ages of Man

Poor Oedipus

Born in Thebes, Oedipus was left to die on a mountaintop because a seer told Laius and Jocasta, his parents, that this infant was a threat to the throne. In real life he would have just died of exposure, another unfortunate unwanted child statistic, but in Greek mythology, a shepherd saves him and takes him to Corinth, where he is raised to believe he is the son of the king. Later the Oracle at Delphi, without so much as a “spoiler alert,” tells him he will kill his father and marry his mother. He vows to never go home to Corinth – a problem avoided is a problem solved, right? Oops.

Back in Thebes, King Laius having removed what he’s been told is the only threat to his throne, becomes a blustery bully who picks fights with travelers.  Enter young Oed, who takes crap from no one and kills Laius. Oops again, first half of the prophesy fulfilled.

But before Fast Oedi can meet Jocasta, the love of his life, he hears of a monster wreaking havoc in Thebes. A Sphinx. a mean monster with the head and bust of a woman, and body of a lion, has laid siege to the city. “Nobody get’s in or out unless he answers my riddle,” she screams.

Apparently ancient Greeks were not too good at riddle solving, because the Sphinx was murdering all who failed and there were a lot of bodies stacking up. So Oedipus stepped up. (This was in what the poet Hesiod called the Heroic Age after all, the only age which wasn’t worse than the previous one.)

“OK,” says the Sphinx, “what animal walks first on four legs, then on two, and later three?”

I don’t know if Oedipus gets it right away or has to think with the ancient Greek equivalent of the Jeopardy theme song playing in the background, but he answers,

“A man. He crawls as a baby, rises to walk on two legs, but must lean upon a cane when he is old.”

Evidently the Sphinx didn’t have much time for disappointment at being outsmarted, because Fast Oedi kills her too and then goes off to shack up with his mom, blind himself and become the subject of the Sophocles play and countless Freudian analyses.

The Riddle

One thing that intrigues me about the Sphinx’s riddle is that the Greeks cast man as an animal. Contrast that with the Judeo-Christian tradition of man with “dominion over all animals, the birds of the air, and the fish of the sea.”

Another is the unity of the stages of man’s growth, four legs two, and even aged leaning on a cane, he is one animal, a man. (This really meant a “person,” but somehow for ancient Greeks man was less a gender specific  is today.) I think as a child, I felt I was treated as somehow less than human. I was to “do as I was told,” not “talk back,” and accept what adults told me without question. These days there are times when my age makes me invisible. A colleague told me, “stop telling people how old you are; no one will listen to you.”

The Greeks seem to see a person, as one animal. He learns and his locomotion changes, but is one animal.

Aesop

The Greek fabulist (or Phrygian, which is in modern day Turkey) told a story of the Man, the Horse, the Ox and the dog.

Three animals a horse, and ox and a dog walked in the winter mountains. They were starving and freezing when they came upon a cabin in the wood. The man who lived there invited them in, made a warm bed for each near the fire. The man gave oats to the horse, hay to the ox and shared his own dinner with the dog.

Grateful, the animals each gave some of their essence to the man. They divided his life between them. The horse gave to youth, the high spirits and impatience with restraint. The Ox took gave strength to middle age, for hard work, steadiness, and focus. The dog took old age and gave loyalty and devotion to those who provided care, but peevishness and disdain for fools.

Aesop also made man one animal, but noted the differing attitudes of man as he aged. I think of the Big Mama Thornton song, that Elvis Pressley made famous, “You ain’t nothin’,but a hound dog.”

Shakespeare

In As you Like It, there are two characters Touchstone and Jacques, who comment on the foibles of the other characters who behave foolishly and struggle to find or admit love. Touchstone the jester, is the optimist, the romantic who falls in love with love, whose humor is always rosy. Jacques is the failed idealist, the cynic who uses humor to mask his pain, upon discovering that the world is not ideal.

The Bard gives the description of the seven ages of man to the cynic Jaques. It has become one of the most famous speeches in Shakespeare,  and the one that Richard Kindersley’s sculpture, pictured above, is meant to represent.

All the world’s a stage,
And all the men and women merely Players;
They have their exits and their entrances,
And one man in his time plays many parts,
His Acts being seven ages. At first, the infant,
Mewling and puking in the nurse’s arms.
Then the whining schoolboy, with his satchel
And shining morning face, creeping like snail
Unwillingly to school. And then the lover,
Sighing like furnace, with a woeful ballad
Made to his mistress’ eyebrow. Then a soldier,
Full of strange oaths and bearded like the pard,
Jealous in honor, sudden and quick in quarrel,
Seeking the bubble reputation
Even in the cannon’s mouth. And then the justice,

In fair round belly with good capon lined,
With eyes severe and beard of formal cut,
Full of wise saws and modern instances;
And so he plays his part. The sixth age shifts
Into the lean and slippered pantaloon,
With spectacles on nose and pouch on side;
His youthful hose, well saved, a world too wide
For his shrunk shank, and his big manly voice,
Turning again toward childish treble, pipes
And whistles in his sound. Last scene of all,
That ends this strange eventful history,
Is second childishness and mere oblivion,
Sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything.

Old Will doesn’t give Jacques nice things to say about man, Babies are “mewling and puking.” Kids hate school, young lovers “sighing” and “woeful.” Soldiers are “quick to quarrel.” Justices fat and pompous.

Jacques reserves his worst criticisms for the old, the “slippered pantaloon” and “second childishness. . . sans everything.” Not sure whether this cynic would say I’m in sixth or seventh stage, but I think I’d find his remarks offensive either way.

I think old Will had some darker days. At least he had an appreciation for the depressive view of life, “Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow, creeps in this petty pace till the last syllable of recorded time. And all our yesterdays have lighted fools the way to dusty death. . .Life’s but a walking shadow, a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury signifying nothing.” (Macbeth) That’s not exactly uplifting, but it did provide writers with some good book titles.

Touchstone has some good lines too: “The more pity that fools may not speak wisely what wise
men do foolishly.” But I wish that Will had him address each of Jacques cynicisms about the stages of man. For each of the negative can be countered by love.

The mewling puking child is made beautiful and adoring through love. The whining schoolboy made to care for school through a teacher’s care. The lover’s sighs are requited, the soldier’s quick temper cooled. Listening with love to the old saws of the round bellied justice, and the man-child voice of the shrunken pantaloon, and even the toothless near oblivion second child improves their stage of life and the listener too.

But Touchstone is mum on such sentiments, so the seven stages of man stand as written.

Today

Younger friends now greet me holding my handshake with two hands, offering big smiles and riveting eye contact saying “How are you?”. People my age and younger tell me to stop calling myself old or making jokes about being “still vertical,” or “one step ahead of the Reaper.”

I figure I’ve got some time left, but know that is not guaranteed. I do know that pondering the ages of man and where I fit is amusing, but even less valuable than reflecting on my life so far. Reflecting on history is only well spent as a driver of improvement, and change takes action.

I don’t even mind if people think I’m so over the hill they need to say something that implies I look better than they expect for someone my age. Sometimes I repeat the Jerry Seinfeld joke, “The three ages of man: youth, middle age, and you look good!

 

Traveling the Consulting Road is Available Now on Amazon

Please forgive the crass commercialism. I haven’t figured out how to attract sales for my book without hawking it. And today (January 23, 2024) is the last day of the discount for subscribers, reviewers, family and friends. Tomorrow I start advertising on Amazon and it goes up to market price. 😊 – Alan

Consultants Are Everywhere *

Consultants Are Everywhere *

In 1991 I wrote about how I was continually amazed at the ubiquity of consulting and how I found it in the most unexpected situations.

My hair cutter then was an unusual man, a dark-skinned Mediterranean, a guy’s guy, a salesman, a dealmaker, quick with a joke or a story. I went to him not just for his stories, but because he cut my hair really well.  I found it difficult to find a good cutter, and Mico was a good cutter.

But I did like his stories. I collect stories the way other guys collect beer mats or coins.

One day, Mico started by saying, “You may appreciate this.  I mean, because you’re a consultant.”

I told him once what I did; he remembered a lot, at odd times perhaps, but I was still flattered.

“I was a consultant once, to a college, a community college. . . . me, a guy who just made it outta high school. This is one of the only colleges in the country with a course in cosmetology.  The state wanted to close them down. They weren’t making any money. They’d had these statistical engineers come in. The state sent them . . . they couldn’t find out what was wrong.”

Mico went on to tell me how he went into the school, observed for two days, then talked to the faculty together and individually and talked to the students together and individually. He explained to each of them:

“This school is yours. When I leave, you’re gonna work or go to school here, if you save it.”

His real-world experience (he had successfully run his own shop for years) and his down-to-earth manner apparently won over faculty and students alike. He made some suggestions; they made some suggestions. They took action.

“A year later they paid for my ticket to come back and see what they did. They were profitable.  The state was happy. They were happy. And it made me feel good, you know. They gave me a lotta credit when I was there. You know, they said I had turned it around. That made me feel good. But they did it. Probably could do it again without me now if they had to. I see why you like what you do . . . You know, I get a lotta guys who don’t like what they do and I think . . .”

Mico was off on another tale, but I was back at that community college with him. He had described a near-perfect process intervention that had left the client empowered to continue on after he left.

His principles are the consulting process: Enter- Diagnose-Solve – Implement – Disengage

Observe with the eyes of the outsider who knows something about what they do.

Gather input from many sources.

Make suggestions.

Give them their ball back, and then

Leave, get out. fish, relatives, and consultants stink if they’re around too long.

 

* Always be prepared to find wisdom in unusual places.  Drawing wisdom from Mico’s stories started me on my career as a writer. This one is the Preface to Traveling the Consulting Road.

Traveling the Consulting Road is Available Now on Amazon

Weird Thinking, Org. Design and Super Asymmetry

Weird Thinking, Org. Design and Super Asymmetry

“You think weird!”

Fred, my client, was being complimentary. He was explaining why he liked having me around. “No really, I mean it. You see third and fourth level consequences that I would never think about. You understand multiple connections and five ways to solve a problem, when I’m lucky to see one. You think weird,, and I like that.”

At that moment we were in the middle of integrating an acquisition, and people from both companies were already pretty freaked out. The two companies had different fiscal years and therefore different performance appraisal schedules. Synchronizing appraisal schedules seemed like a quick win to Fred. I suggested that accelerating some performance reviews and delaying others before the new organization was complete might be misinterpreted. It didn’t seem like rocket science, but he was too close to it until I spelled it out.

In fairness this wasn’t the first or last time I was told I think weird. I have an intuitive way of taking in information. Where some like to process in an order A-Z, 1-10, I am quite comfortable starting at 4 and 6 and not only inferring 5, but also 1,2 and 3. Sometimes if my brain and my mouth aren’t in sync, I start talking skipping those inferred numbers and strange connections and people respond with, “Huh?”

Luckily, I have learned (mostly) to slow down and specify inferences and unseen connections. My wife keeps me straight at home and a colleague, the late Dr. Richard Taylor, used to keep me straight at work.

Two kinds of thinking

Divergent thinking generates ideas and convergent thinking evaluates them

I worked with groups on innovation or continuous improvement initiatives. While the objectives of these two types of initiatives are different there are many similarities between them including a requirement to separate divergent thinking from convergent thinking.

The objective of divergent thinking is to generate a quantity of ideas. It employs intuitive connections, thinking in analogies, or contrarian thinking (“What is it NOT like?”). Brainstorming and Edward de Bono’s Six Hats are well-known techniques.

The objective of convergent thinking is the best idea . .  implemented. This invo9lves evaluation, risk assessment, measurement, and planning. Divergent thinking is much more prevalent in business. Managers and leaders learn to analyze, evaluate, measure, plan, and do

The key is not to mix them. Just as it is destructive during brainstorming to say, “That’s a dumb idea,” it is equally destructive during implementation to say, “here’s another idea.”

Unthink

I recent read Dr. Eric Zabiegalski’s book Unthink: All You Have to Do Is Nothing.  Dr. Zabiegalski  describes two mental processes “Exploration” and “Exploitation.” These are roughly correlative to divergent and convergent thinking. Exploitative process is more common in business he says.  People learn how to take an idea and wring the most value from it to deliver profit. Explorative process is rarer. Explorers look for new and unserved needs, apply new technologies to novel uses, try things that have never been done before. Dr. Zabiegalski makes a strong case that as individuals and organizations we need to stop and use explorative thinking more.

High Performing Organizations

In 2002, I was a principal at Katzenbach Partners, a small McKinsey spinoff, started by Jon Katzenbach (the Wisdom of Teams guy) with two partners from McKinsey. The idea behind Katzenbach’s firm was to work at the intersection between strategy and organization, combining both content and process consulting. I worked at three firms who had this idea. It always sounds so great, but it never works. Content consultants are masters of convergent thinking. Process consultants stick around and implement more and are more likely to use and encourage clients to use both types of thinking.

For a firm offsite, I was asked to do a one hour presentation on High Performing Organizations. I was given a strong hint that McKinsey had done significant research in this arena. Reading Eric Zabiegalski’s book led me to look up that old presentation.

Twenty-years later I was surprised by the congruence of my presentation with Dr. Zagiegalski’s research. I summarized the research to date, by Tom Peters and Bob Waterman, Jim Collins, David Nadler, Warner Burke and George Litwin, Jay Galbraith, and Jon Katzenbach himself.

I pointed out that all the major organization models including the much vaunted  McKinsey High Performing Organization model and the evolving Katzenbach Partners model had several characteristics: Organization Models McKinsey 7S, Nadler Org system, Burke-litwin Org Dynamics, Galbraith Star

  • Strategy or goal driven
  • Not just structure, many elements:
    • The formal and planned – structure, systems, processes, management, leadership
    • The informal and serendipitous – networks, flexible units, culture
    • Alignment and integration are critical success factors

These models are alignment models, where formal and informal elements are aligned, and work together. In Dr. Zabiegalski’s words they are exploitation models. They operate like a high speed train on rails. I described that train on rails as a “beautiful thing. . .  until it wasn’t. The disruptive forces of the 21st century required a different capability -innovation, the ability to know when and how to reinvent our organization.

21st century disruptive forces knock an aligned org  train off the rails  I described how innovation was a critical capability that needed to be baked into organizations or aligned high performance would turn into disaster very quickly.

I described a high performing organization as a study in balance, between the critical capabilities of alignment and innovation. Dr. Zabiegalski’s words, exploitation and exploration, better describe the thinking and acting processes than my words of alignment and innovation. Further he describes the end state as an ambidextrous organization, which is is the subject of his doctoral research and his first book. Whichever words we use the concept of balancing these two ways of thinking and acting individually and organizationally are consequential in our tumultuous times.

I write this post to explain the resonance I feel with Dr, Zabiegalski’s work, not to imply any comparison between my small thought project and the depth or his doctoral research and not one but two books on the subject would be in anyway justified.

It all began with the Big Bang

“And now for something completely different” as they used to say on Monty Python, and to demonstrate how truly weird my brain is:

When I was thinking about this I was also thinking about the American television comedy series, The Big Bang Theory.

For those from other countries or just not interested in silly situation comedies, this show is about the lives of four Caltech scientist researchers, a theoretical physicist, and experimental physicist, an astrophysicist, and a space engineer. These twenty-somethings are socially inept nerds, and the show centers on their attempts to grow up and find female companionship. The main character is Dr. Sheldon Cooper, a theoretical physicist looking to develop the Theory of Everything from a String Theory base. Sheldon is probably the smartest of the four and he knows it. He is also the most annoying and socially awkward and he doesn’t know that. He dreams of the Nobel Prize. Sheldon’s girlfriend is Dr. Amy Farah Fowler, a neuro biologist who is as obnoxiously nerdy as he is.

Spoiler Alert:

In the eleventh of twelve seasons, through a series of silly connections Sheldon and Amy hit upon a Theory of Super Asymmetry for which they win the Nobel prize in the finale of season twelve.

The Big Bang Theory was written with the greatest respect for actual science. The research and theories that were discussed are real and accurate, but Super Asymmetry is fiction. It’s based upon Super Symmetry, which is is a documented theory of paired particles that explains what Einstein called “spooky movement at a distance,” unseen connections at the quantum level between  particles. This was first demonstrated by Dr. David Bohm and later verified with the Hadron supercollider at Cern, Switzerland.

But Super Asymmetry is the creation of Dr, David Saltzberg, the show’s science expert advisor. There is a lot of online fan banter that the character of Amy doesn’t deserve to share the Nobel because it is a theoretical physics discovery and Amy is a neurobiologist. (I know, I know, it’s TV show!) I remember some dialogue about how Sheldon was making the comparison of the Heisinger Uncertainty Principle and Schrodinger’s Cat being alive and dead at the same time. Then something his religious East Texas Mom believed that he thought untrue, but found could be true and untrue at the same time. Amy relayed how the synapses in the brain fired along the same neural pathways in the brain until suddenly they didn’t, making different connections between right or left hemispheres and the amygdala. Super Asymmetry is present in nature, in the brain, physical and quantum levels.  It has a kind of sciencey truthiness, but its fake.

Well, says I, if there are connections at the quantum level, particle pairings (Super Symmetry -the real one) and nature embraces both symmetry and asymmetry, then Super Asymmetry  the fictional one) might be true. I wonder.

If Super Asymmetry were true then what is the neuroscience relationship between conscious, subconscious, and collective unconscious,  and connections in the physical and quantum worlds, both symmetrical and asymmetrical?

How does that relate to balancing exploration and exploitation by causing our busy brains to stop to engage our intuition, Unthink, as it were. And if Individuals could do that then maybe they might build self-organizing ambidextrous organizations to do the same and we might get through the kind of earth-shaking change in store for us in this century.

Did I mention I’m retired? 😊

Fred, you’re right. I think weird!

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!

Calendar Schmalendar!

Today is January 1st. Actually I am writing this over three days starting on December 30th and it won’t be posted on this site until 4:00 a.m. on January 2nd and goodness knows when you are reading it – assuming anyone is actually reading it.

There is this day called New Year’s, on a 12 month calendar, the first day of the first month. January is named for Janus, the Roman two-visaged god of beginnings, looking back to the old year and forward to the new. As far as I know human beings are the only animals who mark time in this way. According to scientists’ observations, most animals mark time around their reproductive cycles. Maybe mayflies and elephants have a different sense of time from each other and from us.

We humans, mostly, mark time by days, months, years (and hours, minutes, seconds nanoseconds and centuries). For quite some time, people have been marking months and days in a calendar. Every year my wife gives me a wall calendar with interesting pictures and my nephew and his wife send me one with Japanese woodcut prints that sits on my desk. This keeps me on track in retirement where every today is like yesterday and/or tomorrow. Appointments, both for me and Billie, go into our laptop calendars and into our phones, so we don’t schedule colonoscopies that conflict with dentist appointments. There is probably a synching technology to make that process easier, but my “late-adopter” persona hasn’t discovered it yet.

The first calendar (that we know of) dates to about 8000 BCE and was discovered in 2004 by archaeologists digging in Aberdeenshire, Scotland. It is a series of rocks and pots in the ground from which one can track the movement of the sun and moon, a luni-solar calendar. The calendar aligns with the winter solstice sunrise so day markings can be corrected once a year. Most calendars in use today are either lunar like the Chinese and Jewish calendars or solar like the twelve month Gregorian one that we use.

Our current calendar was created for Pope Gregory XIII in 1582 CE, because the previous calendar invented by Sosigenes for Julius Caesar in 40 BCE lost 11 minutes a year and so by the sixteenth century was off by about ten days. The Julian calendar itself was created because the previous Roman Republic calendar, supposedly created by Romulus in 738 BCE was off by three months. I don’t know what that did for colonoscopy scheduling, but it apparently messed up sowing and reaping crops.

What’s in a date?

We say it is January 1 and most of the world abides by the Gregorian calendar so you don’t show up for the United Nations twelve days late, but for religious celebrations and for New Year’s, well everyone does their own thing.

Eastern Orthodox Christians in Greece, Serbia, Russia, Ukraine, Israel, and Georgia keep the Julian calendar for religious celebrations. Former Byzantines didn’t buy some Roman pope’s idea. January 1 is a saints day part of advent of Christmas, celebrated on January 6th or 7th. There isn’t a Eastern religious New Year’s celebration, but some observe New Year’s on January 14th.

The Chinese New Year is based upon a lunar calendar and so it moves around between January 21st  and February 20th.  It is February 10th in 2024.The Korean Seolial is celebrated the same day as is the Vietnamese Tét Nguyên Dán. The Japanese Shōgatsu is  a multi-day festival that has been celebrated on January1st  since 1873, during the Westernization of the Meiji period.

Many peoples celebrate the New Year in the spring, which makes sense to me, new growth, new year. Nyepi, the Balinese New Year, Nowruz, the Iranian New Year are celebrated in March. Vikram Sawant, the Hindu New Year is also a March holiday, (though I’ve been told that some Hindus celebrate Diwali, the fall festival of light as New Years; some celebrate in the spring. “It depends on where your family is from”). Buddhists in Thailand and India celebrate Songkran in April close to the New Year’s celebrations of Tamils (Puthandu) and Sri Lankan Sinhalese (Aluth Arevudda).

The Muslim Hijri celebrates the journey of the prophet Muhammad from Mecca to Medini. The sacred month of Muharrum is determined on a lunar calendar and celebrated differently by Shia and Sunni Muslims.

Fall New Years include the ancient Celtic Samhain (November1), Rosh Hashanna, The Jewish New Year (October 2-4, 2024), Enkutatash, the Ethiopian New Year, (September 11) and Western Australia Aboriginal Murador New Year (October 30).

It’s all in the superstitions and traditions?

There are many superstitions and traditions for the New Year around the world. My mother served a meal of salmon for wisdom, rice for riches, cornbread for the golden glow of happiness, black-eyed peas for peace, and greens for growth. (We usually had kale or spinach, because you couldn’t find the collards of my mom’s Alabama youth in New England.). My father always said “what you do on New Year’s day you will do throughout the year.” I remember him writing a letter to his sister in Florida when long distance phone calls were too expensive. I try to talk with each of my children spread across the United States on New Year’s Day.

First footings in Scotland (first across your threshold in the New Year) dictates the year and he or she better bring coal, salt or whiskey. Brazilians wear white and jump in the ocean. The Spanish eat grapes. Italians wear red underwear. Japanese eat soba noodles. In Denmark I’ve heard they smash plates. Bread and salt seem to be important in a lot of places, as do apples, dates, pomegranates and various fruits.

Regrets, reflections, and re-visions

Amid the laughs, libations, and general frivolity, however, many cultures have a sober, somber side to the passing of the old year and welcoming of the new. Some see the old-year-new-year transition as a time to reconnect with ancestors especially those lost in the old year.

The ancient Celts viewed Samhain as a time when the spirits of the dead roamed freely between the Otherworld and our own, which is why we have ghosts on Halloween and why the Church coopted the holiday to All Hallows Eve a time to pay respect to your forebearers and the saints. All Saints Day, November 1 was to be spent in church praying, which probably curtailed some old Celt carousing the night before. Even the Robert Burns song, based upon a Scots folk hymn, which we sing at the stroke of midnight, faking the lyrics we’ve forgotten or never knew, has  roots in respecting memories of the “old long since gone:

Should auld acquaintance be forgot

And never brought to mind

Should auld acquaintance be forgot

And days of auld lang syne

For auld lang syne, my dear

For auld lang syne

We’ll take a cup of kindness yet

For auld lang syne.

It’s like the toast, ‘To absent friends.” We remember.

The night before we Caucasians show up in Chinatown for the rice cakes, dumplings, dragon dances and fireworks, a Chinese family makes offerings to ancestors and gathers for a family reunion dinner. In Chile, some celebrate New Year’s Eve in a cemetery saying goodbye again to family.

It is a time of saying goodbye. Even American broadcast news has a segment In Memoriam to those we lost this year. This year that list included singers Harry Belafonte and Tony Bennett and a segment on Friends TV show star, Matthew Perry, “much loved and gone too soon.”

Many of us take stock of the previous year, and our lives to date at New Years. We are where we are as a consequence of decision and actions we made in the past. Some of us are reasonably happy about those consequences; some are feel less sanguine about where our previous selves have dumped us.

January is always the biggest sale month for health club memberships. Workout rooms are full all month. Drinkers of alcohol, especially those who partied a bit too much on New Year’s Eve, join the “Dry January” movement. Many set New Year’s resolutions about working harder, or smarter, spending more time with family, losing a few pounds, or being more positive. I don’t mean to denigrate such efforts; many succeed in improving their lives this way and I believe in improvement.

When I have failed at New Year’s resolutions, it was because I had a result-goal without a corresponding process to achieve it, including milestone measures and planned contingencies when things didn’t go quite as planned. My life is on a pretty even keel right now. Sure, I need to take off the holiday weight, but I know how to do that: Eat less, move more stay out of the Hãagen-Dazs. I can get a little less depressed about politics and a little  more active in the causes and candidates I believe in; 2024 is a big political year in the U.S.

We have much to do together starting this year, but ending war, world poverty, hunger and homelessness, and slowly climate change are all disconnected goals without a clear corresponding process to achieve them.  Let us start by listening with care, even while we stand up to hate, do so with love. Think Big – start small. Darkness gives way to light; be a candle.

I’m going to work on that – and taking small actions. I’m a writer; I’ll write about my progress.

What about you? How do you re-envision yourself and your contribution to the general good this year?