Avoiding Leadership Dysfunction

The difference between managers and leaders:

  • Managers work in a steady state environment and are accountable for getting the work done and for developing their people to get the work done and improving
  • Leaders work in an abnormal environment, change, emergencies, and are accountable for direction and for getting people to follow, “Hey guys, this way, follow me!”

There’s a reason why the military always talks about leadership; they  prepare their workers for the ultimate abnormal environment, war.

In business, management skills and leadership skills are often expected from the same person, your boss. Over my career the business press has progressed from talking about management skills to leadership skills. I think this is for three reasons:

  • Nobody wants to be the boss or be bossed. Managers and supervisors are looked down upon; everybody wants to be a leader.
  • We live in an increasingly abnormal business environment, constant change -changes in technology that change industries overnight, mergers and acquisitions and other structural changes, changes in societal norms, customer and worker attitudes and expectations. As someone said to me “There is no steady state!”
  • In this environment influence, peer leadership, has increased in importance, and direct lines of authority, have had to respond or as someone else said to me, “You can’t tell anyone what to do anymore!”

Leadership Dysfunction

So everyone is a leader, even the boss and everyone has an opinion on leadership. If you read LinkedIn, there are some bad leaders out there. Here are a few of the dysfunctions of leadership:

  • Unclear, poor, wrong direction: People will forgive a leader who is wrong, if he or she admits it or is transparent about what is a guess. Lack of clarity, confusion is less forgivable, especially if followers pay for the consequences.           Symptoms include:
    • A vision that keeps changing. Some evolution is to be expected in uncertain times, but wild swings in the way a leader talks about the change implies the leader doesn’t know and hasn’t said “I don’t know.”
    • KPI of the week -most organizations have too many key performance indicators, but the change should have two to four at most that the leader keeps coming back to. At British Airways it was customer service (as rated by JD Power) and profit.
    • Tunnel-vision and trivia – for instance a leader who picks apart cost minutia in an innovation that will lead to doubling market share and profit.
  • “He doesn’t want to lead you; he just wants you to follow him.” This was a quote about the villain Grindelwald from the movie “The Secrets of Dumbledore.” It describes a narcissist who craves the adulation of followers, but gives nothing back. He sees no value for others, but feels entitled to their worship.  It is all about the leader when it should be all about the direction, the vison, the mission and the followers.In the movie, Grindelwald, is a psychopath, who manipulates people to obtain power for evil purposes. In your life, the leader may just be ego-centric, but glimmers of the expectation for adulation still exist.

Symptoms include:

  • A leader who values flattery and loyalty over truth-telling. If the “suck-ups” always get the best roles, the most time with the leader, the biggest budgets, and most praise, then no one will say “this isn’t working.”
  • A leader that explodes at bad news, blames and denigrates the messenger. If you hear “You tell him.” “Uhn-uhn, not me, you tell him,” then the leader only gets honey-glazed info-crap. In this situation “No news is not good news.”
  • Pseudo-empathy, some have learned how to fake a genuine interest in followers. They say things like, “That must have been tough for you, but. . .” “I hear you, but. . .” Ignore anything said before the “but,” no matter how sensitive it sounds.
  • True anti-social behavior – I’m enough of an optimist to believe that despite the fact that some people call their bosses “psychopaths” or “sociopaths,” these are clinically rare in the workplace. There are some people who are unusually sensitive to others and misuse that gift for power. Sometimes these people feign emotions well and combine that with verbal acuity to be quite manipulative.

If you work for someone that seems to be able to make you elated one day and pinpoint your weaknesses, verbally eviscerate you to the point of tears the next. Forget that it is an exciting place to work. Run away, far and fast.

We’ve been looking at this from the point of view of the follower admittedly from the slightly jaundiced viewpoint epitomized by Bob Dylan,  in “Subterranean Homesick Blues:”

 “Don’t follow leaders; watch out for parking meters.”

How to Lead

But what should you do if you are the leader, if it is your job to make some part of the change happen. Here are a few ideas:

  • Don’t be dysfunctional – if you see yourself with any of the dysfunctions above, stop, get help (a friend who can signal you to stop, a coach, training, whatever it takes).
  • Focus on the direction, vision, mission of the change. People will pay attention to what you systematically pay attention to, and measure and control on a regular basis. Make sure it’s the right thing.
  • Be clear about what you role model – what’s most important? Getting it right the first time or Try-it-fix-it-try-it-again? Big Picture or sweat the small stuff? If you’re running innovation and/or improvement initiatives learn the methodology and do a project yourself. What you do people will emulate.
  • Control how you react to bad news, set-backs, incidents, and crises. Thank the people who bring bad news and tell the truth.
  • Give time and resources, rewards and status to people who tell the truth (not suck-ups) I once saw a leader make a joke out of SUWI (suck-up with integrity) vs. SUWOI (suck-up without integrity). The leadership team had felt required to flatter the previous leader and the SUWI SUWOI joke turned that around in two meetings.
  • Recruit, select, develop, promote people who do the right things and do things right. The people who make the change happen, get results (do the right things) and build good processes (do things right) should end up running the changed place.

As Dr Edgar Schein pointed out leaders shape culture, by establishing what is important. “Culture is the long shadow of leadership behavior.”  Make sure your shadow is one that serves your people and the change you intend them to make.

Please join the conversation by leaving a comment below.

If you enjoyed my writing, please click the button below to subscribe to receive 1-2 posts per week, no ads, no affiliate links and I will never sell, trade or otherwise distribute your information. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking unsubscribe on the email.

A Friday Some Years Ago:

9:00. Phone rings.

“Hello? Oh, Hi Ken…”

12:00 noon. Phone rings.

“Hi Ken, what’s up?”

4:45 p.m. Phone rings.

“Hi Ken… Say Ken, Are you checking on me?”

“Well, actually, yeah. When I work from home I only get about two hours of work done all day. What with the kids and the dog, trying to work from the kitchen counter, and the TV, and computer games. It’s very distracting. We pay you quite a lot and I was just trying to see if you are actually working.”

“OK, Ken, I get it. But I’m in my office on the second floor of my house. It has a desk, phone, files and computer. There’s no TV. I have no games on my computer. My kids are grown and don’t live with me. The dog is old and goes out before work and after. Besides Ken, I only charge you when I’m actually working. We can review the training I wrote today if you’d like.”

“Well, I’m headed home; can you email it?”

“Sure.”

My client was new to the job and he had inherited a consulting team. To him it was easy to see us working when we were on site, but given his personal experience working from home, he couldn’t imagine us working productively on Friday, when we weren’t on site.

In fact, for certain kinds of head-down individual work, I got a great deal more done on Fridays than I did during the week, when I had to attend meetings with clients and build commitment to change. However, I understood that many managers in offices shared Ken’s experience and the concerns that arose from it.

Then Came Covid

Durin the coronavirus pandemic, workers in factories, healthcare, first responders, retail, and food service risked their lives and office workers learned to be productive “working from home.” Office productivity didn’t suffer as expected and office workers liked the flexibility, the lack of wasted commuting time, and not wearing pants on Zoom calls.

I retired in 2018, so this really didn’t affect me directly. I heard about it from my kids. One time consulting colleagues called to ask how I worked as an independent consultant. People asked about my home office and what the IRS required to deduct the set-up of a home office, (dedicated space, documented use, and expense receipts). I started to see jobs advertised as “remote,” or “hybrid.”

Some people figured out they could work from anywhere and you saw magazine articles of people working from the deck of their beach house. I was always jealous of that because I didn’t have a beach house.

Some people complained about the isolation of Covid-time. As the pandemic died down, some people reminisced about standing on balconies of city apartments banging pots in support of first responders and healthcare workers. Covid was something that affected us all, a unifier after a time of division.

Then Covid was (finally) over

Well, not really over. Covid is still around. We’re just done with it, over it; Covid is so four years ago. For the last four years, there has been a discussion building.

“OK everybody, it’s time to return to work.”

That one pissed off all those workers in factories, healthcare, first responders, retail, and food service who risked their lives.

“We never stopped working.”

So R-T-W became R-T-O, “return to office.”

Some were enthusiastic; some were less so. Sure, there would be less isolation, but more colds and flu (and Covid whispered the risk averse). And then there is wasted commute time. And then there is the flexibility of working when I want. And then there is the fact that I don’t have to stay late because Mary bent my ear about her mom, and Ted just had to relive the highlights of the big game, etc.

“OK, well, what about two days per week?”

“Maybe.”

“Three?”

“I don’t know.”

It’s been a long four years.

This conversation has been slowly accelerating. I must admit that, Boomer dinosaur that I am, I wasn’t particularly won over by the Gen X, Y, Z, Alpha whines about commuting costs and cleaning bills for the pants they would now have to wear. I also thought that some workers were being clearly unreasonable in their demands.

My nephew runs a retail food business and told me about job applicants who asked if they could “do the retail floor job remotely.” Some jobs require face time.

Culture is built by being together. Teams function best if they actually know each other. I began to hypothesize that introverts would want to work at home but extraverts would want to return to the office. It turns out there is no evidence of that.

I have had more and more conversations recently with office workers, people I respect for their intelligence and projected competence, who say, “If they insist on 5-days-in-office, I will leave.” Or “OK, I’ll come in for 9:00 and leave at 5:00, but there is no working till 7:00 and no calls on nights and weekends.”

There have been some famous CEOs who have gone public “R-T-O or else!” At a recent cookout, huddling under a canopy during an inconvenient downpour, I was engaged in conversation with the manager of administration for the board of directors at a money center bank.

“My CEO is friends with another CEO who has drawn a very public line in the sand, but my colleagues, my boss and three quarters of my staff will walk if he enforces the RTO mandate. Most of the board are off site and 90% of my work is email and phone. I have to be here for board meetings and two or three days a week is reasonable. Five is a hard “No!”

I began to think that managers, even CEOs, who insisted on a 5-day RTO mandate, might be driven by their own convenience  ̶  “I want to turn around an give someone a job directly. I don’t want to find out they’re ‘shirking from home’ and have to call them.”

Then, in today’s New York Times, I came upon an article by Adam Grant, et al, at the Wharton Business School, that quotes research, that demonstrates that:

“ One: Return-to-office mandates don’t increase profits by weeding out people who lack commitment. They motivate the most talented people to jump ship. Two: As long as people are together for half the week, remote work isn’t isolating. And three: Hybrid work isn’t bad for performance, innovation or connection. “

Grant et al go on to describe how adamant RTO mandates are most often pushed by narcissistic managers that require constant attention, as demonstrated by the size of their pay packages, offices, and their photos in the annual reports.

So where does that leave RTO?

It depends. There are clearly some jobs that require presence, just like first responders, and retail workers, if your job has a face to the public, well, you gotta face the public. If your job has more individual than team work, you might have more of an argument for remote or hybrid work.

If you are a manager, who just can’t get over the fact that, “Hey, I got up every day and went into the office. I sucked up to my manager and now its my turn,” then maybe look in a mirror. Get over yourself, and see how you can lead change three days a week or on Zoom without any pants.

You may also like. . .

Sacrifice

Sacrifice

My Memorial Day verse was not published the first time I tried, seems I’m cursed by technology’s worst. Here’s hoping this remembrance burst makes it now.

read more

Please contribute your thoughts in a comment. The author will be notified, but may not respond to every comment. The site reserves the right to delete comments it deems off topic, offensive, or spam.

4 Comments

  1. Eugenia

    I like your last lines and what Dr. Edgar Schein pointed out – leaders shape culture, by establishing what is important. “Culture is the long shadow of leadership behavior.” Make sure your shadow is one that serves your people and the change you intend them to make.

    I wish this was put into practice more frequently and by many leaders.

    Reply
    • Alan Culler

      So True, Eugenia
      Leadership is a great privilege, with which comes greatt responsibility.
      Thanks for your comment.

      Reply
  2. David Ford

    Excellent article Alan. Leadership sets the tone of the organization which ultimately determines how the people will respond and act.

    Reply
    • Alan Culler

      Thanks, David
      I wish more leaders were less tone deaf.

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *