Eastland and Westland Views

A Tale of Two Towns

To the hawk the two lands were not far. A few hours of hard flight perhaps, but with many updrafts for circling and trees on even the tallest ridges if the winds were not right and a rest was required, it could be pleasant. It was a flight the hawk took often, more in the summer than in the winter. There was good hunting for the hawk in the mountains. Even in winter, the rabbits and voles did not expect him.

For people in the two valleys the journey between the lands was arduous. There were no east to west passes through the mountains and the peaks had snow upon them even during the hottest summers. There were deep crevasses and high cliffs that made the trek seem foolhardy.

Unlike the hawk, few people made the journey over the mountain ridge that ran between the rivers all the way to the sea. Traveling was easier following the rivers. It was a long trip down the river valley from either land. The streams sources were at the ice field high above the laird’s house in each country and each ran away from the ridge, southwest in the western land and southeast in the eastern land, before curving back toward the ridge as they neared the sea.

It was said that these two lands had been to war in time beyond counting. The young laughed when the olds would tell the tale their olds had told them in their youth. “Where would they have fought? Hanging off ropes on the cliff? Or at the bottom of some bottomless crevasse?”

Traders would sometimes bring news between these communities, coming up one river from the sea, telling how they had braved the bandits in the foothills on beside the ridge. When traders came to Westland, they would speak of the yellow-glow of the sun on the ridge in the early hours of the Eastland day. Travelers to Eastland would tell of the red-glow on the Westland ridge at night. Mostlythough, these traders would tell how different Eastland and Westland were.

The tone in the tavern in each land was always incredulous, “I can’t believe it! Why would anyone live like that?”

On the surface, both lands looked alike. There was farmland in the plateau and valley,  with somewhat rocky soil on the ridge plateau and richer loam in the valley closer to the river. The laird’s house was built into the side of the mountain overlooking the village and farmland. One difference was that Eastland’s Lairdhouse was built of stone with a tower and Westland’s Lairdhouse was built in a half-timbered style. Each was larger house than any in land, but that was accepted. The laird’s family first cleared the land and invited others to farm it.

Over time both Eastland and Westland farmers had come to “own” their land and their homes they built upon it. They paid the laird a “debt of gratitude,”  a percentage of each harvest. The population was like many towns. Most everyone farmed, at least enough to pay the debt of gratitude and feed themselves,  but there were some merchants, who bought and sold surpluses and interacted with the traveling traders. There were tradesmen, builders, a metalsmith, and a few woodsmiths, who made furniture, staircases for those wealthy enough for a second story, and carved signs.

Both communities had a plethora of beautifully carved wooden signs. There were signs for business names. street names, and to identify who lived in a particular dwelling, but many of the most skillfully carved signs extolled particular virtues. Most of those exquisitely carved signs were paid for by the laird or esteemed elders in the village. There was a small competition in both Eastland and Westland to see which carver was most sought-after, based upon his or her carving skill with the laird’s signs.

There were indeed many similarities between Eastland and Westland. There first indicator of difference travelers would notice were the signs. The signs in both communities were carved from the local woods and while one carver or another might have a particularly creative flourish, overall the signs looked similar. However, the messages on the signs were quite different.

In Eastland the carved signs read:

  • Self-Reliance
  • Discipline
  • Personal Responsibility

In Westland the signs said:

  • Teamwork
  • Compassion
  • Community

Traders who travelled often to both villages heard of other differences between the settlements:

In Eastland the debt of gratitude, paid to the laird was low, about 10 % of crops or livestock, and the same on service or trade, and everyone paid the same percentage. In Westland the debt of gratitude varied depending on how good a farmer’s harvest was or the service or trade amount transacted. Some paid 5% some paid as much as 25%.

In Westland there was a disaster-kitty funded by the debt of gratitude payments. This  flood and fire relief was administered by the village council of elders. In Eastland, someone whose crop flooded, or house burned down could apply to the laird for a loan at interest below the debt of gratitude rate, but might have to forfeit property rights if the loan was not repaid.

In Eastland crop surpluses were sold to the traders who came from down river. In Westland surpluses were also traded, but after the Food Fair Exchange was held. The Food Fair Exchange was an Eastland festival where farmers brought surplus to barter for what they didn’t grow or for volunteer labor.

Some traders said that Eastlanders complained a bit about the “size of the laird’s house” and how “some town council members got extraordinary benefits.”  Other traders said that Westlanders complained about “freeloaders” and the size of the debt of gratitude payment in good years. Most years, Eastland and Westland were equally prosperous and everyone seemed happy.

The hawk flew back and forth across the ridge, not hunting now, just gliding up with the warm afternoon air rising from each side. He flew high eyeing the rivers in the valleys on both sides. The hawk played in the air currents rising from each side, circling, swooping, all the way down the ridge until he felt the cool sea wind. The hawk pulled up against the spray where the sea roared against the cliff and scented the woodsmoke rising from the building near the cliff, before climbing back, back to his nest in the tall fir just below the summer snowline.

Traders often met at the Ridgecliffe Inn, on the path over the ridge close to the sea where you could see the delta ports on both the Eastland and Westland rivers. Ridgecliffe was a gathering place for traders and anyone traveling between the two communities. In the tavern of the Inn, traders traded stories of their travels and often bantered about the signs.

“I was up at Eastland and saw a new sign, “The Truth is the Truth, no matter if it hurts.”

“Yeah, well his cousin in Westland carved “Tact! People have feelings.”

Hard to beat the Eastlands sign, “Be Excellent!”

“Does the Westland sign ‘Be Excellent to Each Other’” mean the same thing?”

“Different, I think.” Like Eastlands “Judgement: Do What is Right!” is different from Westland’s “Judgement: Explain your thinking.”

“You know I saw one sign in both places ‘Honor, Duty, Sacrifice.”

“You can bet those signs have different meanings.”

There were many  nods and smiles around the tavern.

The oldest trader spoke, “You know my favorite signs:

Eastland: ‘The early bird gets the worm.’”

Westland: ‘The second mouse gets the cheese.’” *

Everyone laughed.

“Great to be a woodcarver in either place.”

“That’s for sure. Say – where would you settle down if you’d a mind to?”

The traders all expressed their views and were quite surprised that they didn’t agree.

Where would you settle down if you’d a mind to?

 

 

 

*Thanks to Brad Martin for this line.

Please join the conversation by leaving a comment below.

If you enjoyed my writing, please click the button below to subscribe to receive 1-2 posts per week, no ads, no affiliate links and I will never sell, trade or otherwise distribute your information. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking unsubscribe on the email.

A Friday Some Years Ago:

9:00. Phone rings.

“Hello? Oh, Hi Ken…”

12:00 noon. Phone rings.

“Hi Ken, what’s up?”

4:45 p.m. Phone rings.

“Hi Ken… Say Ken, Are you checking on me?”

“Well, actually, yeah. When I work from home I only get about two hours of work done all day. What with the kids and the dog, trying to work from the kitchen counter, and the TV, and computer games. It’s very distracting. We pay you quite a lot and I was just trying to see if you are actually working.”

“OK, Ken, I get it. But I’m in my office on the second floor of my house. It has a desk, phone, files and computer. There’s no TV. I have no games on my computer. My kids are grown and don’t live with me. The dog is old and goes out before work and after. Besides Ken, I only charge you when I’m actually working. We can review the training I wrote today if you’d like.”

“Well, I’m headed home; can you email it?”

“Sure.”

My client was new to the job and he had inherited a consulting team. To him it was easy to see us working when we were on site, but given his personal experience working from home, he couldn’t imagine us working productively on Friday, when we weren’t on site.

In fact, for certain kinds of head-down individual work, I got a great deal more done on Fridays than I did during the week, when I had to attend meetings with clients and build commitment to change. However, I understood that many managers in offices shared Ken’s experience and the concerns that arose from it.

Then Came Covid

Durin the coronavirus pandemic, workers in factories, healthcare, first responders, retail, and food service risked their lives and office workers learned to be productive “working from home.” Office productivity didn’t suffer as expected and office workers liked the flexibility, the lack of wasted commuting time, and not wearing pants on Zoom calls.

I retired in 2018, so this really didn’t affect me directly. I heard about it from my kids. One time consulting colleagues called to ask how I worked as an independent consultant. People asked about my home office and what the IRS required to deduct the set-up of a home office, (dedicated space, documented use, and expense receipts). I started to see jobs advertised as “remote,” or “hybrid.”

Some people figured out they could work from anywhere and you saw magazine articles of people working from the deck of their beach house. I was always jealous of that because I didn’t have a beach house.

Some people complained about the isolation of Covid-time. As the pandemic died down, some people reminisced about standing on balconies of city apartments banging pots in support of first responders and healthcare workers. Covid was something that affected us all, a unifier after a time of division.

Then Covid was (finally) over

Well, not really over. Covid is still around. We’re just done with it, over it; Covid is so four years ago. For the last four years, there has been a discussion building.

“OK everybody, it’s time to return to work.”

That one pissed off all those workers in factories, healthcare, first responders, retail, and food service who risked their lives.

“We never stopped working.”

So R-T-W became R-T-O, “return to office.”

Some were enthusiastic; some were less so. Sure, there would be less isolation, but more colds and flu (and Covid whispered the risk averse). And then there is wasted commute time. And then there is the flexibility of working when I want. And then there is the fact that I don’t have to stay late because Mary bent my ear about her mom, and Ted just had to relive the highlights of the big game, etc.

“OK, well, what about two days per week?”

“Maybe.”

“Three?”

“I don’t know.”

It’s been a long four years.

This conversation has been slowly accelerating. I must admit that, Boomer dinosaur that I am, I wasn’t particularly won over by the Gen X, Y, Z, Alpha whines about commuting costs and cleaning bills for the pants they would now have to wear. I also thought that some workers were being clearly unreasonable in their demands.

My nephew runs a retail food business and told me about job applicants who asked if they could “do the retail floor job remotely.” Some jobs require face time.

Culture is built by being together. Teams function best if they actually know each other. I began to hypothesize that introverts would want to work at home but extraverts would want to return to the office. It turns out there is no evidence of that.

I have had more and more conversations recently with office workers, people I respect for their intelligence and projected competence, who say, “If they insist on 5-days-in-office, I will leave.” Or “OK, I’ll come in for 9:00 and leave at 5:00, but there is no working till 7:00 and no calls on nights and weekends.”

There have been some famous CEOs who have gone public “R-T-O or else!” At a recent cookout, huddling under a canopy during an inconvenient downpour, I was engaged in conversation with the manager of administration for the board of directors at a money center bank.

“My CEO is friends with another CEO who has drawn a very public line in the sand, but my colleagues, my boss and three quarters of my staff will walk if he enforces the RTO mandate. Most of the board are off site and 90% of my work is email and phone. I have to be here for board meetings and two or three days a week is reasonable. Five is a hard “No!”

I began to think that managers, even CEOs, who insisted on a 5-day RTO mandate, might be driven by their own convenience  ̶  “I want to turn around an give someone a job directly. I don’t want to find out they’re ‘shirking from home’ and have to call them.”

Then, in today’s New York Times, I came upon an article by Adam Grant, et al, at the Wharton Business School, that quotes research, that demonstrates that:

“ One: Return-to-office mandates don’t increase profits by weeding out people who lack commitment. They motivate the most talented people to jump ship. Two: As long as people are together for half the week, remote work isn’t isolating. And three: Hybrid work isn’t bad for performance, innovation or connection. “

Grant et al go on to describe how adamant RTO mandates are most often pushed by narcissistic managers that require constant attention, as demonstrated by the size of their pay packages, offices, and their photos in the annual reports.

So where does that leave RTO?

It depends. There are clearly some jobs that require presence, just like first responders, and retail workers, if your job has a face to the public, well, you gotta face the public. If your job has more individual than team work, you might have more of an argument for remote or hybrid work.

If you are a manager, who just can’t get over the fact that, “Hey, I got up every day and went into the office. I sucked up to my manager and now its my turn,” then maybe look in a mirror. Get over yourself, and see how you can lead change three days a week or on Zoom without any pants.

You may also like. . .

Sacrifice

Sacrifice

My Memorial Day verse was not published the first time I tried, seems I’m cursed by technology’s worst. Here’s hoping this remembrance burst makes it now.

read more

Please contribute your thoughts in a comment. The author will be notified, but may not respond to every comment. The site reserves the right to delete comments it deems off topic, offensive, or spam.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *