Presidents Day

“Grampa, did you have to cut out these pictures for Presidents Day?”

I guess that’s a thing now in some pre-K and kindergarten classes. It trains fine motor skills while celebrating the holiday.

“I didn’t do that. There was no Presidents Day then.”

“You were born before Presidents Day? You are really old.”

My grandchildren are nicer than this fictional conversation, but I really was a kid before there was a Presidents Day.

I remember celebrating George Washington’s birthday, February 22nd, and Abraham Lincoln’s birthday February 12th, separately. Maybe we only got Washington’s birthday off from school, but we did the full-on American hero stories on both presidents.

You know,

“George, who chopped down that cherry tree?” “I cannot tell a lie, Father. It was I, with my little hatchet.”  And

“Honest Abe” who read by candlelight and walked miles to return a book.

It turns out the first story, boy George chopping down the cherry tree, but declining to dissemble, was made up by Mason Locke Weems for his 1806 biography Life of Washington, which may very well be the book that Honest Abe walked miles to return.

We were told plenty of myths about both men in elementary school, which I’ve since learned the truth about.

George Washington was not the greatest military general of all time. He single-handedly started the French and Indian War (called the Seven Years War elsewhere), by preemptively attacking the French in what became Pittsburgh, and lost many more battles than he won during the Revolutionary War.

Washington didn’t skip a dollar across the Potomac. He never lived in the White House, but in presidential mansions in New York and Philadelphia. He is buried at Mount Vernon and not in the Capitol crypt, although there is a Capitol crypt. George Washington did wear dentures but made of human and cow teeth and not wood.

We were not told that Washington owned over 200 slaves nor that he refused to free them after the Revolutionary War despite their service, even when the British took former American slaves, which they had freed strategically, back to England.

Despite rumors to the contrary, Abraham Lincoln never owned slaves, nor did his father nor his wife, Mary Todd. However, Honest Abe was not an abolitionist until shortly before his death. The Emancipation Proclamation was a military strategy and did not apply to slaves in the border states of Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri nor to what became West Virginia, nor Tennessee, his Vice President Andrew Johnson’s home state.

Abe’s whole homespun-rail-splitter-to-White-House image was political positioning. While he was self-educated, he was a corporate lawyer and politician before running for president. The Lincoln-Douglas debates were for a Congressional seat not the presidency. Unlike his portrayal in the John Ford biopic, Lincoln never faced down a lynch mob saving two men, and unlike another movie, he never fought vampires. Lincoln is buried in Illinois not in the Lincoln Memorial.

The Gettysburg address was not written on the train on the back of an envelop; there are five progressively polished drafts available in the National archives. Abe was not the featured speaker at Gettysburg. John C. Fremont was, and Abe wasn’t received all that well at the time. Mostly people were just grateful that he was brief, as Fremont spoke for two and a half hours.

Still, Washington was our first president and he held the newborn country together. He believed in the Constitution but also that it would be improved. We were just starting out as a country and there was nowhere to go but up.

Perhaps unbelievably, he resigned both his generalship after the war and his presidency after two terms, an act that prompted King George III to say he was a “leader for the ages.” In his final address he warned us of regional factionalism, the divisiveness of political parties, and about foreign entanglements, not allies, but those who would turn the young nation into their puppet state.

Abraham Lincoln held the Union together, when some argued to let the South “depart in peace.” Abe did everything to win the war including suspending habeas corpus, using the military to detain anti-draft rioters in New York and disloyal individuals in Maryland without charge.

In his second term he fought for the 13th amendment (abolishing slavery) though he didn’t live to see it passed and ratified. After the war, when we again had nowhere to go but up, he spoke enthusiastically about reconciliation, in an oft-quoted way “with malice toward none and charity for all.”

Lincoln authorized the first transcontinental railroad and signed the Homestead Act of 1863, which gave interior land for free. The Homestead Act had many negative unforeseen consequences, both for the Native American population and ecologically, but it expanded the country geographically and economically and may be the single piece of legislation responsible for the “American Dream” of home ownership and social class mobility.

So despite the myths, George and Abe probably deserve the spotlight. Washington’s birthday was made a complete Federal holiday in 1885. It became Presidents Day in 1971 placing it on  a Monday between Washington and Lincoln’s birthdays, making it a three-day-weekend.

It’s interesting to me that it’s called Presidents Day, not President’s Day. That means to me that we honor the two men for whom it was created and also the office and all who have held it.

The US constitution specifies three co-equal branches of the federal government:

  • The executive branch, including the presidency, and executive agencies, to execute the laws, administer public policy, conduct diplomacy and foreign policy, be responsible for national defense and military policy. The president is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces.
  • The legislative branch, House of Representatives and Senate, who make the laws, confirm executive appointments (Senate), finance and control the federal budget, provide oversight of the executive branch, declare wars, ratify treaties, and generally reflect the will of the people who elect them to represent their best interests.
  • The judicial branch, including all Federal Courts and the Supreme Court, interpret the laws, resolve disputes and determine the constitutionality of all laws and executive actions.

So, when we created Presidents Day do you think those in the know wanted to:

  1. Honor all presidents living and dead, who take on the tremendous responsibility of serving the public and protecting our country, or
  2. Smush Washington’s birthday and Lincoln’s birthday together and give everyone a three-day-weekend.

Recently comedian Nick Bargatze hosted Saturday Night Live and performed a skit which poked fun at Washington’s dream for America:

“I dream that we shall have a word for the number twelve.”

“What other numbers shall we have a word for, sir?”

“None.…”

“… We will have two words for animals, one when they are alive and another when they are food.  So cows will become beef, pigs will become pork.”

“Chicken, sir?”

“That one stays….”

“… I must admit this is confusing.”

“Don’t worry, soldier, in our great nation we will have schools that will teach our children our ways.”

“How many years of school, sir?”

“Twelve.”

“Oh, so a dozen years?”

“No. We don’t use it that way….”

“The children will not have to go to school every day. We shall have our own holidays, Fourth of July, Flag Day, and Presidents Day.”

“And what shall we do to honor our leaders on Presidents Day, sir?”

“Buy a mattress, of course.”

(You can watch this entire skit here.)

So after the GIANT PRESIDENTS DAY MATTRESS SALE ends, and when the chaos of school vacation is over, spare a thought for George and Abe, who helped us define American leadership, flawed, well-intentioned, and mostly moral, and who helped us build something great.

Or as Washington said:

“Citizens by birth or choice of a common country… the name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations.”

And let Lincoln’s words from his second inauguration and Gettysburg inspire us:

“ …let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds…”

such that:

“…government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

Please join the conversation by leaving a comment below.

If you enjoyed my writing, please click the button below to subscribe to receive 1-2 posts per week, no ads, no affiliate links and I will never sell, trade or otherwise distribute your information. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking unsubscribe on the email.

A Friday Some Years Ago:

9:00. Phone rings.

“Hello? Oh, Hi Ken…”

12:00 noon. Phone rings.

“Hi Ken, what’s up?”

4:45 p.m. Phone rings.

“Hi Ken… Say Ken, Are you checking on me?”

“Well, actually, yeah. When I work from home I only get about two hours of work done all day. What with the kids and the dog, trying to work from the kitchen counter, and the TV, and computer games. It’s very distracting. We pay you quite a lot and I was just trying to see if you are actually working.”

“OK, Ken, I get it. But I’m in my office on the second floor of my house. It has a desk, phone, files and computer. There’s no TV. I have no games on my computer. My kids are grown and don’t live with me. The dog is old and goes out before work and after. Besides Ken, I only charge you when I’m actually working. We can review the training I wrote today if you’d like.”

“Well, I’m headed home; can you email it?”

“Sure.”

My client was new to the job and he had inherited a consulting team. To him it was easy to see us working when we were on site, but given his personal experience working from home, he couldn’t imagine us working productively on Friday, when we weren’t on site.

In fact, for certain kinds of head-down individual work, I got a great deal more done on Fridays than I did during the week, when I had to attend meetings with clients and build commitment to change. However, I understood that many managers in offices shared Ken’s experience and the concerns that arose from it.

Then Came Covid

Durin the coronavirus pandemic, workers in factories, healthcare, first responders, retail, and food service risked their lives and office workers learned to be productive “working from home.” Office productivity didn’t suffer as expected and office workers liked the flexibility, the lack of wasted commuting time, and not wearing pants on Zoom calls.

I retired in 2018, so this really didn’t affect me directly. I heard about it from my kids. One time consulting colleagues called to ask how I worked as an independent consultant. People asked about my home office and what the IRS required to deduct the set-up of a home office, (dedicated space, documented use, and expense receipts). I started to see jobs advertised as “remote,” or “hybrid.”

Some people figured out they could work from anywhere and you saw magazine articles of people working from the deck of their beach house. I was always jealous of that because I didn’t have a beach house.

Some people complained about the isolation of Covid-time. As the pandemic died down, some people reminisced about standing on balconies of city apartments banging pots in support of first responders and healthcare workers. Covid was something that affected us all, a unifier after a time of division.

Then Covid was (finally) over

Well, not really over. Covid is still around. We’re just done with it, over it; Covid is so four years ago. For the last four years, there has been a discussion building.

“OK everybody, it’s time to return to work.”

That one pissed off all those workers in factories, healthcare, first responders, retail, and food service who risked their lives.

“We never stopped working.”

So R-T-W became R-T-O, “return to office.”

Some were enthusiastic; some were less so. Sure, there would be less isolation, but more colds and flu (and Covid whispered the risk averse). And then there is wasted commute time. And then there is the flexibility of working when I want. And then there is the fact that I don’t have to stay late because Mary bent my ear about her mom, and Ted just had to relive the highlights of the big game, etc.

“OK, well, what about two days per week?”

“Maybe.”

“Three?”

“I don’t know.”

It’s been a long four years.

This conversation has been slowly accelerating. I must admit that, Boomer dinosaur that I am, I wasn’t particularly won over by the Gen X, Y, Z, Alpha whines about commuting costs and cleaning bills for the pants they would now have to wear. I also thought that some workers were being clearly unreasonable in their demands.

My nephew runs a retail food business and told me about job applicants who asked if they could “do the retail floor job remotely.” Some jobs require face time.

Culture is built by being together. Teams function best if they actually know each other. I began to hypothesize that introverts would want to work at home but extraverts would want to return to the office. It turns out there is no evidence of that.

I have had more and more conversations recently with office workers, people I respect for their intelligence and projected competence, who say, “If they insist on 5-days-in-office, I will leave.” Or “OK, I’ll come in for 9:00 and leave at 5:00, but there is no working till 7:00 and no calls on nights and weekends.”

There have been some famous CEOs who have gone public “R-T-O or else!” At a recent cookout, huddling under a canopy during an inconvenient downpour, I was engaged in conversation with the manager of administration for the board of directors at a money center bank.

“My CEO is friends with another CEO who has drawn a very public line in the sand, but my colleagues, my boss and three quarters of my staff will walk if he enforces the RTO mandate. Most of the board are off site and 90% of my work is email and phone. I have to be here for board meetings and two or three days a week is reasonable. Five is a hard “No!”

I began to think that managers, even CEOs, who insisted on a 5-day RTO mandate, might be driven by their own convenience  ̶  “I want to turn around an give someone a job directly. I don’t want to find out they’re ‘shirking from home’ and have to call them.”

Then, in today’s New York Times, I came upon an article by Adam Grant, et al, at the Wharton Business School, that quotes research, that demonstrates that:

“ One: Return-to-office mandates don’t increase profits by weeding out people who lack commitment. They motivate the most talented people to jump ship. Two: As long as people are together for half the week, remote work isn’t isolating. And three: Hybrid work isn’t bad for performance, innovation or connection. “

Grant et al go on to describe how adamant RTO mandates are most often pushed by narcissistic managers that require constant attention, as demonstrated by the size of their pay packages, offices, and their photos in the annual reports.

So where does that leave RTO?

It depends. There are clearly some jobs that require presence, just like first responders, and retail workers, if your job has a face to the public, well, you gotta face the public. If your job has more individual than team work, you might have more of an argument for remote or hybrid work.

If you are a manager, who just can’t get over the fact that, “Hey, I got up every day and went into the office. I sucked up to my manager and now its my turn,” then maybe look in a mirror. Get over yourself, and see how you can lead change three days a week or on Zoom without any pants.

You may also like. . .

Sacrifice

Sacrifice

My Memorial Day verse was not published the first time I tried, seems I’m cursed by technology’s worst. Here’s hoping this remembrance burst makes it now.

read more

Please contribute your thoughts in a comment. The author will be notified, but may not respond to every comment. The site reserves the right to delete comments it deems off topic, offensive, or spam.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *