Spare Iny Change?

I’m a bit of a sucker for panhandlers. I have lived my life trying to be helpful and, when I encounter someone who asks for a little help, I too frequently reach into my pockets. My family know this about me and tend to increase our pace around street people.

Some years ago I was walking with my son and daughter along Broadway in the Capital Hill district of Seattle. Capital Hill was a young hip part of town with lots of restaurants and coffee shops, but it also attracted healthy white suburban teenagers who “bummed money” to finance their Saturday entertainment before going home to the ‘rents place to sleep.

As we walked, “Spare iny change?” was mumbled from seemingly every street corner. My kids hustled me along.

We were following a nicely dressed long haired twentyish guy, who perhaps because he was young seemed to attract requests for money.

“Spare iny change?”

The long-hair barely turned, “No man, change comes from within.” He kept walking.

We cracked up. Even now remembering the stunned look on the panhandling teen’s face makes me smile. My son said, “I am definitely stealing that line.”

Leaders are often in the change game, not spare change, but real change with consequences.

We lead towards something or away from something, but often the leader must find a strength within that others will follow.. Sometimes the same people who manage us day to day are the same people who lead us in a new direction, but not always.

Consulting is always about change.

Companies may hire a consultant to change strategy or customer base, innovate new products, improve processes or install systems. Funny then that, when I joined the field, consultants didn’t define themselves as in the change business. They were in strategy, innovation, improvement, or systems, but not change. There was detailed PowerPoint slides explaining the reasons for the [new strategy, system, or *** ], a step-by-step how-to, and the benefits that the [***] would bring, without ever using the ‘C’ word. “Don’t say change; it scares people,” a senior consultant told me.

Some consultants included a slide entitled “Change Management.” This showed training, or new roles and responsibilities, or new metrics. At one point in my career I was given “change management project streams.” I was brought in late in the project and introduced as the “change guy.” This was often said with a sneer by consultants who felt that what I did was “squishy.” One project leader said, “your work has no content in it.”

These days more consultants recognize the fundamental truth that change is about altering behavior – people must do things differently or do different things. And that includes the leaders.

Good leaders quickly figure out that people don’t change without a reason.

The incompetent or insecure leader (or consultant) will say “people resist change because they fear change.” It isn’t true. Look the number of people who move to a different job, city, or country. Look at the people who get married, have children, start businesses, or  try anything that will turn their life upside down.

What do those changes have that the change you are leading doesn’t? Simple, choice. People choose to undertake those changes. Those are their changes; This one is your change.

Still people make jokes about “fear of change.” A colleague told me the story of his resistance to his wife’s entreaties to buy a new house with more bedroom and yard space for his kids. He kept showing reluctance and coming up with reasons that she considered lame.

“I’d have to rebuild my workshop, and I just got my office the way I like it.”

“I think you’re just afraid of change,” she accused.

Consultants are good at breaking tension. “Honey,” he said. “I just sell change; I don’t do change.”

They both laughed. In the end they bought the house.

People do fear loss, loss of status, loss of financial security, loss of familiar routine, loss of certainty. So if the outcome of the change is unknown, they may assume it will mean loss for them and push back.

This is why Niccolò Machiavelli  said at the beginning of the sixteenth century,

“There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things. Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new.”

Change has no natural constituency in the way that the status quo has. So the job of the leader is to enlist followers.

I used to talk with leaders about how people change by using this diagram:

how people change

I, like many consultants, think in models like this, geometric shapes connected by arrows. I learned that  about  26% of the population thinks this way. That means that 74% doesn’t think like this. So I learned to describe it more in paragraph terms.

People come to some insight – e.g. what I am currently doing isn’t working – I’m sitting on my couch eating ice cream and not losing weight.

I see someone else moving more than I do and eating less. Eureka! I think I might try that.

I take action . (I eat less and move more.)

It works. I lose weight.

(Note: Most people realize that even losing weight is more complex than that. There are measurements to take, old habits to break, false starts, relapses,  and recriminations to shake, etc. Still with direction, determination,  and disciplined action one can get results. Some more easily than others.)

Leading people in an organization through a change, the leader:

  • First shares insight – acknowledges reality (what’s not working, the compelling case for change, the why).
  • Then explains the destination – the vision of the changed company.
  • Takes action and leads followers to take action
  • Measures and shares results.

This is where the complexity comes in. There are many different kinds of change for companies, changes in target customers, changes in products, changes in processes, and technology. There are mergers and acquisitions, changes in financing (like going public or taking on venture capital) and many more.

Some problems companies can improve their way out of, some require radical innovation. Many require companies to get smaller and stronger before growing again. The devil is in the details; the leader must explain the type and context of the change and bring followers along with them.

Another thing that some leaders forget is that for the organization to change the leader must change. Oops.

Change leaders must get people to follow them away from comfortable habits and processes to a new way of doing things that may or may not be better. It is a tough job.

In my consulting work I was often called in to fix a failed change effort. In most cases the cause of the failure was that the leaders had underestimated the people side of the change and had devoted little energy to changing themselves.

Perhaps the leaders or their people had developed change fatigue and went looking for yet another methodology. Perhaps they hadn’t thought about interim metrics to show when they were off track. My approach was always the same: get back to talking about the objectives of the change and look for ways to achieve interim results.

I never heard anyone say “Spare iny change?” Nor was I ever tempted to say, “No man, change comes from within.” But it does.

Please join the conversation by leaving a comment below.

If you enjoyed my writing, please click the button below to subscribe to receive 1-2 posts per week, no ads, no affiliate links and I will never sell, trade or otherwise distribute your information. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking unsubscribe on the email.

A Friday Some Years Ago:

9:00. Phone rings.

“Hello? Oh, Hi Ken…”

12:00 noon. Phone rings.

“Hi Ken, what’s up?”

4:45 p.m. Phone rings.

“Hi Ken… Say Ken, Are you checking on me?”

“Well, actually, yeah. When I work from home I only get about two hours of work done all day. What with the kids and the dog, trying to work from the kitchen counter, and the TV, and computer games. It’s very distracting. We pay you quite a lot and I was just trying to see if you are actually working.”

“OK, Ken, I get it. But I’m in my office on the second floor of my house. It has a desk, phone, files and computer. There’s no TV. I have no games on my computer. My kids are grown and don’t live with me. The dog is old and goes out before work and after. Besides Ken, I only charge you when I’m actually working. We can review the training I wrote today if you’d like.”

“Well, I’m headed home; can you email it?”

“Sure.”

My client was new to the job and he had inherited a consulting team. To him it was easy to see us working when we were on site, but given his personal experience working from home, he couldn’t imagine us working productively on Friday, when we weren’t on site.

In fact, for certain kinds of head-down individual work, I got a great deal more done on Fridays than I did during the week, when I had to attend meetings with clients and build commitment to change. However, I understood that many managers in offices shared Ken’s experience and the concerns that arose from it.

Then Came Covid

Durin the coronavirus pandemic, workers in factories, healthcare, first responders, retail, and food service risked their lives and office workers learned to be productive “working from home.” Office productivity didn’t suffer as expected and office workers liked the flexibility, the lack of wasted commuting time, and not wearing pants on Zoom calls.

I retired in 2018, so this really didn’t affect me directly. I heard about it from my kids. One time consulting colleagues called to ask how I worked as an independent consultant. People asked about my home office and what the IRS required to deduct the set-up of a home office, (dedicated space, documented use, and expense receipts). I started to see jobs advertised as “remote,” or “hybrid.”

Some people figured out they could work from anywhere and you saw magazine articles of people working from the deck of their beach house. I was always jealous of that because I didn’t have a beach house.

Some people complained about the isolation of Covid-time. As the pandemic died down, some people reminisced about standing on balconies of city apartments banging pots in support of first responders and healthcare workers. Covid was something that affected us all, a unifier after a time of division.

Then Covid was (finally) over

Well, not really over. Covid is still around. We’re just done with it, over it; Covid is so four years ago. For the last four years, there has been a discussion building.

“OK everybody, it’s time to return to work.”

That one pissed off all those workers in factories, healthcare, first responders, retail, and food service who risked their lives.

“We never stopped working.”

So R-T-W became R-T-O, “return to office.”

Some were enthusiastic; some were less so. Sure, there would be less isolation, but more colds and flu (and Covid whispered the risk averse). And then there is wasted commute time. And then there is the flexibility of working when I want. And then there is the fact that I don’t have to stay late because Mary bent my ear about her mom, and Ted just had to relive the highlights of the big game, etc.

“OK, well, what about two days per week?”

“Maybe.”

“Three?”

“I don’t know.”

It’s been a long four years.

This conversation has been slowly accelerating. I must admit that, Boomer dinosaur that I am, I wasn’t particularly won over by the Gen X, Y, Z, Alpha whines about commuting costs and cleaning bills for the pants they would now have to wear. I also thought that some workers were being clearly unreasonable in their demands.

My nephew runs a retail food business and told me about job applicants who asked if they could “do the retail floor job remotely.” Some jobs require face time.

Culture is built by being together. Teams function best if they actually know each other. I began to hypothesize that introverts would want to work at home but extraverts would want to return to the office. It turns out there is no evidence of that.

I have had more and more conversations recently with office workers, people I respect for their intelligence and projected competence, who say, “If they insist on 5-days-in-office, I will leave.” Or “OK, I’ll come in for 9:00 and leave at 5:00, but there is no working till 7:00 and no calls on nights and weekends.”

There have been some famous CEOs who have gone public “R-T-O or else!” At a recent cookout, huddling under a canopy during an inconvenient downpour, I was engaged in conversation with the manager of administration for the board of directors at a money center bank.

“My CEO is friends with another CEO who has drawn a very public line in the sand, but my colleagues, my boss and three quarters of my staff will walk if he enforces the RTO mandate. Most of the board are off site and 90% of my work is email and phone. I have to be here for board meetings and two or three days a week is reasonable. Five is a hard “No!”

I began to think that managers, even CEOs, who insisted on a 5-day RTO mandate, might be driven by their own convenience  ̶  “I want to turn around an give someone a job directly. I don’t want to find out they’re ‘shirking from home’ and have to call them.”

Then, in today’s New York Times, I came upon an article by Adam Grant, et al, at the Wharton Business School, that quotes research, that demonstrates that:

“ One: Return-to-office mandates don’t increase profits by weeding out people who lack commitment. They motivate the most talented people to jump ship. Two: As long as people are together for half the week, remote work isn’t isolating. And three: Hybrid work isn’t bad for performance, innovation or connection. “

Grant et al go on to describe how adamant RTO mandates are most often pushed by narcissistic managers that require constant attention, as demonstrated by the size of their pay packages, offices, and their photos in the annual reports.

So where does that leave RTO?

It depends. There are clearly some jobs that require presence, just like first responders, and retail workers, if your job has a face to the public, well, you gotta face the public. If your job has more individual than team work, you might have more of an argument for remote or hybrid work.

If you are a manager, who just can’t get over the fact that, “Hey, I got up every day and went into the office. I sucked up to my manager and now its my turn,” then maybe look in a mirror. Get over yourself, and see how you can lead change three days a week or on Zoom without any pants.

You may also like. . .

Sacrifice

Sacrifice

My Memorial Day verse was not published the first time I tried, seems I’m cursed by technology’s worst. Here’s hoping this remembrance burst makes it now.

read more

Please contribute your thoughts in a comment. The author will be notified, but may not respond to every comment. The site reserves the right to delete comments it deems off topic, offensive, or spam.

6 Comments

  1. Bob Musial

    Point and points well made Alan. Keep doing what you’re doing.

    Reply
    • Alan Culler

      Appreciate the encouragement, Bob Thank You.

      Reply
  2. Eugenia

    Well thought out and interesting points made, Alan.

    Reply
    • Alan Culler

      Thanks, Eugenia I appreciate your support.

      Reply
  3. David Ford

    Thanks Alan for these stories of wisdom. I find them insightful and helpful to me.

    Reply
    • Alan Culler

      Thanks, David
      I appreciate your support.

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *